A1) CML Alliance is a global program to help healthcare providers and their patients fully optimize therapy and achieve the best possible outcomes in the treatment of Ph+ CML.
CML Alliance provides support and educational materials for both healthcare professionals and patients.
For healthcare professionals, the program aims to provide or facilitate access to:
Standardized molecular testing
Educational information on the molecular biology and management of Ph+ CML
Information about Ph+ CML clinical trials on investigational agents and existing therapies in Ph+ CML
For patients and caregivers, CML ALLIANCE offers:
Unique programs designed to help patients better understand Ph+ CML, its treatment, and the importance of adherence to their Ph+ CML therapy
Valuable educational information about living with Ph+ CML
The affiliates of Novartis AG believe that the best way to optimize therapy in all patients with CML worldwide is to provide these services as part of a single, integrated program. Services provided through CML Alliance are highly customized in each country in which it is offered, depending on local legal and regulatory specifications. In Europe, one example of an initiative developed in conjunction with CML ALLIANCE was the European Treatment and Outcome Study
(EUTOS) for CML, which has had a major influence in increasing the number of Molecular Monitoring and Pharmacological Monitoring Centers and helped them to reach national and standardized status.1For specific information and services available in each country, please contact your local Novartis organization.
A2) Depending on local rules and regulations in each country, CML Alliance is available to patients with Ph+ CML, those taking TASIGNA®, and those receiving GLIVEC®.
A4) CML Alliance fully complies with all privacy and confidentiality regulations of the countries in which it is implemented. For example, in the United States, CML Alliance complies with all HIPAA regulations.
A6) GLIVEC® led to a fundamental shift in care, as Ph+ CML evolved into a chronic disease that now requires long-term treatment. A decline in patient adherence can be an issue with long-term oral therapy.2 Recent studies have demonstrated that decreased adherence plays a significant role in preventing patients from achieving optimal treatment goals.3,4
The Hammersmith study demonstrated that adherence was the critical factor for achieving molecular responses and that adherence rate was the only independent factor that predicted complete molecular response (CMR). In fact, no CMR was observed when adherence was ≤90% (90% adherence is equivalent to missing 2 to 3 tablets per month). Moreover, no MMR was witnessed when adherence was ≤80%.3
The ADAGIO study reported similar findings, demonstrating a link between adherence and treatment outcomes4:
Patients with suboptimal responses missed at least 7 daily doses each month, whereas patients with optimal responses missed only 1 or 2 daily doses each month
Patients who failed to achieve CCyR missed at least 7 daily doses each month, whereas patients who achieved CCyR missed only about 3 daily doses each month
Nonadherence to treatment is a major issue in patients with chronic conditions who do not exhibit illness-related symptoms of their disease and may, over time, forget how important it is to take their therapy exactly as prescribed. Suboptimal adherence to oral therapy can lead to disease progression or death.2
A7) Evaluation of molecular response - the disappearance or reduction in BCR-ABL transcript levels, has significant prognostic value in Ph+ CML therapy.5 Molecular responses help further evaluate the depth of a patient's hematologic and cytogenetic response to ensure that a patient's treatment is optimized over time.6
Molecular response has been found to correlate with both cytogenetic response and long-term progression-free survival.5
Regular molecular testing is recommended by the NCCN guidelines and ELN Recommendations
A8) RQ-PCR is the most sensitive method to determine the levels of BCR-ABL transcripts.5 RQ-PCR can detect a single BCR-ABL-positive cell per 105 normal cells, and changes in transcript levels can be detected even when cytogenetic changes are not evident.5
RQ-PCR results can differ considerably between labs and also drift over time for an individualized lab, making interpretation difficult. An international scale for reporting of BCR-ABL transcript measurements was established to minimize variation and allow for easy interpretation between laboratories.7 Standardized RQ-PCR allows physicians to evaluate results in relation to clinical trial data and consensus guideline recommendations to help optimize therapy for patients with Ph+ CML.
A9) Where permissible under local laws and regulations, CML Alliance will offer standardized RQ-PCR testing through certified laboratories that utilize the international scale. This will provide physicians with access to consistent and easily interpretable PCR results for better management of Ph+ CML patients.
Services through CML Alliance will be customized to best meet the needs and regulatory and legal requirements of each country. For specific information and services available in your country, please contact your local Novartis organization.
Note: Before prescribing, please read full European Summary of Product Characteristics.
References
Müller MC, Cross NCP, Erben P, et al. Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe. Leukemia. 2009;23(11):1957-1963.
Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487-497.
Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon FX, et al. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieved complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2381-2388.
Noens L, van Lierde M-A, De Bock R, et al. Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study. Blood. 2009;113(22):5401-5411.
Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, et al; European LeukemiaNet. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108(6):1809-1820.
Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108(1):28-37.
Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108(1):28-37.
Disclaimer: This site is intended to provide information to healthcare professionals outside the United States. Please note that not all products listed within this site may be available in all countries. Also, prescribing information and indications for products may differ from country to country, so please consult your local Novartis company for local prescribing and any other information you may be interested in.