Recent Adherence Studies | CML Alliance
For Healthcare Professionals Outside the US
Send To a FriendPrint This PageChange Text Size

Recent Studies : AdherenceRecent Studies : Adherence

In the treatment of Ph+ CML with TKI therapy, 2 recent clinical trials have shown that adherence to oral therapy is critical to achieving and maintaining optimal response.1,2 In fact, evidence demonstrates that missing more than 2 or 3 daily doses each month can negatively impact response.1,2 Here is a summary of the results from the Hammersmith study and the ADAGIO study.

THE HAMMERSMITH STUDY1

Study design
  • 87 patients completed the study
  • Patients had achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), had chronic-phase Ph+ CML, and had received oral therapy for at least 2 years
  • Adherence was monitored over 90 days

Key findings
  • Adherence rate (>90% or ≤90%) was strongly associated with the 6-year probability of MMR (Figure 1), 4-log reduction in BCR-ABL, complete molecular response (CMR), and response at 18 months

    Figure 1: 6-Year Probability of MMR by Adherence Rate


    Please click on the image to enlarge it

    Reproduced from Marin et al.1
    • Probability of MMR for the 23 patients with an adherence rate ≤90% was 13.9%, while for the 64 patients with an adherence rate >90% it was 93.7% (P<0.001)1
  • Almost all patients who missed fewer than 3 daily doses each month achieved MMR1
    • Only 1 in 7 patients who missed at least 3 daily doses each month achieved MMR1
    • No patient who missed at least 6 daily doses each month achieved MMR1
    • Almost half of patients who missed fewer than 3 daily doses each month achieved CMR; no patient who missed at least 3 daily doses each month achieved CMR1
  • Adherence was poor after dose increase to greater than 400 mg per day1
  • Adherence rate and hOCT1 transcript level were the only 2 independent predictors of MMR and 4-log reduction; adherence rate was the only independent predictor of CMR1

Additional findings1
  • Young patients were more likely to have a lower adherence rate
  • Unexplained 5-fold increases in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels were predictive of poor adherence
  • Low adherence was common in patients suffering from adverse effects—healthcare providers should regularly ask patients if they are experiencing adverse effects

Conclusions1
  • Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses; adherence rate was the only independent factor that predicted CMR
  • No CMR was observed when adherence was ≤90%; no MMR was observed when adherence was ≤80%. 90% adherence is equivalent to missing 2 to 3 tablets per month

THE ADAGIO STUDY2

Study design
  • 169 patients completed the study
  • Patients had chronic-phase CML for an average of 4 years and were receiving oral therapy
  • Adherence (taking medicine every day as directed by the physician) was evaluated over 90 days

Results
  • More patients failed to adhere to therapy than they, their physicians, and their family members realized
  • Failure to adhere was related to the patient, physician-patient relationship, and treatment center
  • Adherence greatly influenced response, as demonstrated in Figure 2 below

    Figure 2: Response Achieved by Adherence Rate


    Please click on the image to enlarge it

    Adapted from Noens et al.2
    • Patients with suboptimal responses missed at least 7 daily doses each month, whereas patients with optimal responses missed only 1 or 2 daily doses each month2
    • Patients who failed to achieve CCyR missed at least 7 daily doses each month, whereas patients who achieved CCyR missed only about 3 daily doses each month2
  • Patients who function well and those who have taken oral CML therapy for a long time may become more lax about taking their medication2

Next: Tips to Improve Patient Adherence

Note: Before prescribing, please read full European Summary of Product Characteristics.

References

  1. Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon F-X, et al. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieved complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2381-2388.
  2. Noens L, van Lierde M-A, De Bock R, et al. Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study. Blood. 2009;113(22):5401-5411.